Sequences and Mathematical Induction
Prove formulas and properties using mathematical induction with base case and inductive step.
What is Mathematical Induction?
Mathematical induction: Proof technique for statements about natural numbers
Like dominos:
- Knock down first domino (base case)
- Each domino knocks down next (inductive step)
- All dominos fall
Use when: Proving formulas or properties for all n ≥ 1 (or other starting value)
Principle of Mathematical Induction
To prove P(n) is true for all n ≥ n₀:
Step 1: Base Case
- Prove P(n₀) is true
Step 2: Inductive Step
- Assume P(k) is true for some arbitrary k ≥ n₀ (inductive hypothesis)
- Prove P(k+1) is true using this assumption
Conclusion: P(n) is true for all n ≥ n₀
Example 1: Sum Formula
Prove: 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n = n(n+1)/2 for all n ≥ 1
Base Case (n = 1):
LHS: 1
RHS: 1(1+1)/2 = 2/2 = 1
LHS = RHS ✓
Inductive Step:
Assume true for n = k:
1 + 2 + 3 + ... + k = k(k+1)/2
Prove true for n = k+1:
1 + 2 + 3 + ... + k + (k+1) = (k+1)(k+2)/2
Start with left side:
LHS = [1 + 2 + 3 + ... + k] + (k+1)
= k(k+1)/2 + (k+1) [by inductive hypothesis]
= k(k+1)/2 + 2(k+1)/2 [common denominator]
= [k(k+1) + 2(k+1)]/2
= (k+1)(k+2)/2 [factor]
= RHS ✓
Conclusion: Formula true for all n ≥ 1
Example 2: Sum of Odd Numbers
Prove: 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n-1) = n² for all n ≥ 1
Base Case (n = 1):
LHS: 1
RHS: 1² = 1
LHS = RHS ✓
Inductive Step:
Assume for n = k:
1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2k-1) = k²
Prove for n = k+1:
1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2k-1) + (2(k+1)-1) = (k+1)²
The next odd number: 2(k+1) - 1 = 2k + 1
Start with LHS:
LHS = [1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2k-1)] + (2k+1)
= k² + (2k+1) [by inductive hypothesis]
= k² + 2k + 1
= (k+1)² [perfect square]
= RHS ✓
Conclusion: Formula true for all n ≥ 1
Example 3: Powers of 2
Prove: 2ⁿ > n for all n ≥ 1
Base Case (n = 1):
2¹ = 2 > 1 ✓
Inductive Step:
Assume for n = k:
2^k > k
Prove for n = k+1:
2^(k+1) > k+1
Start with LHS:
2^(k+1) = 2 · 2^k
> 2 · k [by inductive hypothesis]
= k + k
≥ k + 1 [since k ≥ 1]
= RHS ✓
Conclusion: 2ⁿ > n for all n ≥ 1
Example 4: Divisibility
Prove: n³ - n is divisible by 3 for all n ≥ 1
Base Case (n = 1):
1³ - 1 = 0
0 ÷ 3 = 0 ✓ (divisible)
Inductive Step:
Assume for n = k: k³ - k = 3m for some integer m
Prove for n = k+1: (k+1)³ - (k+1) is divisible by 3
Expand:
(k+1)³ - (k+1) = k³ + 3k² + 3k + 1 - k - 1
= k³ - k + 3k² + 3k
= (k³ - k) + 3(k² + k)
= 3m + 3(k² + k) [by inductive hypothesis]
= 3[m + k² + k] [factor]
This is 3 times an integer, so divisible by 3 ✓
Conclusion: n³ - n divisible by 3 for all n ≥ 1
Example 5: Inequality
Prove: n! > 2ⁿ for all n ≥ 4
Base Case (n = 4):
4! = 24
2⁴ = 16
24 > 16 ✓
Inductive Step:
Assume for n = k ≥ 4: k! > 2^k
Prove for n = k+1: (k+1)! > 2^(k+1)
Start with LHS:
(k+1)! = (k+1) · k!
> (k+1) · 2^k [by inductive hypothesis]
> 2 · 2^k [since k+1 > 2 when k ≥ 4]
= 2^(k+1)
= RHS ✓
Conclusion: n! > 2ⁿ for all n ≥ 4
Common Mistakes
Don't assume what you're trying to prove
- Inductive hypothesis assumes P(k), not P(k+1)
Don't skip base case
- Formula might work inductively but fail for initial value
Don't confuse n and k
- k is arbitrary value in inductive step
Show all algebra steps
- Must explicitly use inductive hypothesis
Variations of Induction
Strong induction: Assume P(1), P(2), ..., P(k) all true
Complete induction: Prove P(n) using P(m) for all m < n
Backwards induction: Start from high value, work backwards
Sequences and Induction
Recursively defined sequences often proved by induction
Example: Fibonacci
Define: F₁ = 1, F₂ = 1, Fₙ = Fₙ₋₁ + Fₙ₋₂ for n ≥ 3
Prove: Fₙ < 2ⁿ for all n ≥ 1
Base cases: (need two for recursive formula)
F₁ = 1 < 2¹ = 2 ✓
F₂ = 1 < 2² = 4 ✓
Inductive step: Assume true for all m ≤ k
Prove for k+1:
F_(k+1) = F_k + F_(k-1)
< 2^k + 2^(k-1) [by hypothesis]
= 2^(k-1)(2 + 1)
= 3 · 2^(k-1)
< 4 · 2^(k-1)
= 2² · 2^(k-1)
= 2^(k+1) ✓
When to Use Induction
Proving formulas for sums, products
Proving inequalities involving n
Proving divisibility properties
Proving properties of recursively defined sequences
Proving statements about sets or graphs (advanced)
Real-World Connection
Computer science: Prove algorithm correctness
Proving loop invariants
Proving recursive functions terminate
Understanding mathematical certainty
Practice
In induction, the base case proves P(n) for:
The inductive hypothesis assumes:
Prove 1 + 2 + ... + n = n(n+1)/2. For n=1, base case gives:
To prove P(k) → P(k+1), we must: